On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 09:29:31PM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:13:25PM +0100, Ladislav Michl wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 07:35:19PM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:20:58AM +0100, Ladislav Michl wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 11:01:14PM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 02:08:12PM +0100, Ladislav Michl wrote: > > > > > > Merge window is really close now and patches seems still to be untested on > > > > > > n8x0. So unless someone is going to test it soon, I'll pick used N800 on > > > > > > ebay :-/ > > > > > > > > > > Today I tried to test them on Nokia N810, and I get: > > > > > > > > > > [ 0.174804] omap-gpmc 6800a000.gpmc: GPMC revision 2.0 > > > > > [ 0.174865] gpmc_mem_init: disabling cs 0 mapped at 0x0-0x1000000 > > > > > [ 0.177459] omap-gpmc 6800a000.gpmc: /ocp/gpmc@6800a000/onenand@0,0 has no 'bank-width' property > > > > > [ 0.177612] omap-gpmc 6800a000.gpmc: failed to probe DT child 'onenand': -22 > > > > > > > > > > With plain v4.15-rc7+ it probes fine. > > > > > > > > Thank you for testing. As stated in cover letter, you need also > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10043259/ > > > > which can be also found in Roger's branch > > > > https://github.com/rogerq/linux/commits/for-v4.16/gpmc-omap-immutable > > > > (see previous replies in this thread and also discussion about OneNAND > > > > DT node) > > > > > > I applied it, and now get: > > > > > > [ 0.174987] omap-gpmc 6800a000.gpmc: GPMC revision 2.0 > > > [ 0.175048] gpmc_mem_init: disabling cs 0 mapped at 0x0-0x1000000 > > > [ 0.177703] omap-gpmc 6800a000.gpmc: Incompatible OneNAND node: missing compatible > > > [ 0.177764] omap-gpmc 6800a000.gpmc: failed to probe DT child 'onenand': -22 > > > > As expected without reading discussion about OneNAND DT node :) > > > > In short, this version expects "ti,omap2-onenand" compatible. > > Right. I didn't realize by bootloader was passing the DTB from an old > kernel. > > So after fixing my boot I got the patches working N800 and N810: I was > able to read and write on old JFFS2 file systems without any issues. So > you can add for the series: > > Tested-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@xxxxxx> Thank you! > > In earlier version of this patchset there was fixup present, so driver > > worked even without compatible. Later on (17 Oct 2017 11:46:51 +0300) > > Roger objected (https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg139576.html): > > "I don't want to fixup broken DTs like this as they will go silently without > > being fixed. Let's instead just error out after the dev_warn(). This will > > force us to fix all DT nodes." > > So fixup was removed. I know N900 support is under heavy development > > in mainline, but if n8x0 is considered finished and stable, we should > > reintroduce fixup. Thoughts? > > N8x0 support is also "under development", and we are fine with updating > and always using latest in-tree DTs. That makes things simpler :) I'll post v6 based on -next with patches 13 and 14 squashed. Thanks to everyone involved for cooperation, ladis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
