Hi Pavel, On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 03:59:59PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > Well, strobe property above already uses = <0>/<1> format, as do > > > > others. > > > > > > > Problem with "false = property does not exist" is that you don't know > > > > if it is "someone forgot to define it" or "someone made a typo" or > > > > "dts is too old to know about this property" or "the property indeed > > > > should be false"... > > > > > > As this is an established practice, I think we should follow it for bool > > > properties. > > > > Yes it's common practice, there is also device_property_read_bool() > > to get the value. > > > > > We could change the existing ones, too, and leave some extra checks in > > > place to handle old dtbs. > > > > The following should be downward compatible: > > > > var = read_bool(); > > if (var && !read_int()) > > var = false; > > > > Btw. DT people should be CC'd for DT binding additions/changes. > > Ok, so for now we do crc=1 by default. Now we'd like to have crc > support configurable in the dts. But if we just introduce "crc;" > option, it will break old dts users. We could introduce "no-crc;" and > that would work in this particular case, but will break when we want > different defaults at different devices. > > Anyway, introducing "no-crc;" seems pretty ugly to me. I'd rather do > "crc=<0>;", in a similar way we handle other options now. The same issue actually exists for CSI-2: the CRC is typically enabled and I think you can at least disable the check (in OMAP3 ISP). Do we have a need to disable it at the moment for any purpose? I think I've seen this was disabled somewhere but it may just as well be a thoughtlessly written configuration. -- Regards, Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html