* Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [170817 16:01]:
> As omap5 supports deeper idle states compared to dra7, let's
> separate dra7 from omap5 in preparation for adding more support
> for omap5.
Oops, sorry this first patch can be ignored. I forgot we already
separated out things for dra7 when we added omap5 cpu
retention mode support earlir. So there's nothing left
to move away for dra7.
> @@ -303,6 +342,9 @@ int __init omap4_idle_init(void)
> if (soc_is_omap54xx()) {
> state_ptr = &omap5_idle_data[0];
> idle_driver = &omap5_idle_driver;
> + } else if (soc_is_dra7xx()) {
> + state_ptr = &dra7_idle_data[0];
> + idle_driver = &dra7_idle_driver;
> } else {
> state_ptr = &omap4_idle_data[0];
> idle_driver = &omap4_idle_driver;
And then this part now wrongly enables things for dra7 while
it can't be done.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
