+Adrian On 20 July 2017 at 15:36, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Ulf, > > On Tuesday 11 July 2017 07:27 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Hi Ulf, >> >> On Tuesday 11 July 2017 06:40 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>> On 16 June 2017 at 14:45, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> wrote: >>>> This is the final part of the series originally sent as >>>> part of [2]. >>>> >>>> This series adds UHS, HS200, DDR mode and ADMA support to >>>> omap_hsmmc driver used to improve the throughput of MMC/SD in dra7 >>>> SoCs. >>>> >>>> Changes from [2]: >>>> *) No more updating omap2plus_defconfig or multi_v7_defconfig is >>>> required, so those patches are removed. >>>> *) Addressed Rob Herring's comment on implementing a function >>>> instead of having a macro while getting pinctrl state. >>>> >>>> This series is created on top of [3], [4], [5] AND [6] >>>> (i.e after >>>> ARM: dts: omap3-overo: Remove "vqmmc-supply" property from MMC dt node >>>> omap_hsmmc: use mmc_regulator_get_supply() to get regulators >>>> omap*: Fixes/Cleanups for MMC devicetree node >>>> ARM: dts: Add iodelay data for MMC) >>>> >>>> The functionality implemented in this series was sent before ([1]) but >>>> was never followed up since supporting high speed modes in dra7 required >>>> IODelay values to be configured. With IODelay driver being merged into >>>> kernel, sending it as a fresh series with support for configuring IODelay >>>> values. >>> >>> Is it safe to queue this via mmc tree for 4.14 or is there a >>> dependency I must consider? The above didn't quite tell me that, could >>> you please elaborate. >> >> There is a dependency with https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg586215.html. >> >> I'll resend the series after all the platform data specific stuff is merged. >>> >>>> >>>> Suggestions of migrating to sdhci driver (from omap_hsmmc driver) is not >>>> addressed since >>>> *) tuning ratio of MMC in dra7 is different from sdhci >>>> *) IOdelay is required for dra7 >>>> *) GPIO based card detect is not supported in sdhci >>> >>> Lots of sdhci drivers calls mmc_of_parse(), and uses the mmc slot gpio >>> APIs, so I don't this this is correct statement. >>> >>>> *) Some of the registers don't always have correct values as in sdhci >>>> (like PSTATE). >>>> Supporting all of these in sdhci will result in adding lot of quirks in >>>> sdhci driver. >>> >>> Is it really that much different? It would be nice if some really took >>> on the challenge of converting omap_hsmmc into an sdhci variant. >> >> Okay. I'll give that a shot and see how far I can get. > > I created a sdhci variant and was able to get it working with high speed mode > in dra7. That's very nice! > > I have a query on sdhci_set_power_noreg() in sdhci.c. sdhci_set_power_noreg > sets SDHCI_POWER_CONTROL based on *vdd* value. However SDHCI_POWER_CONTROL is > for setting bus voltage and need not be based on *vdd*. IMHO > SDHCI_POWER_CONTROL should be set based on "ios->signal_voltage". According to the implementation in sdhci_set_power_noreg(), I understand it as the SDHCI_POWER_CONTROL register actually controls the power to the card (VDD) and the not the I/O voltage level (ios->signal_voltage). However, if I read the SDHCI spec, it seems to be mentioning the "SD bus voltage", which to me is about the I/O voltage level. So either the spec is unclear or the code is wrong. :-) Are you saying that the omap_hsmmc variant is using the SDHCI_POWER_CONTROL to control the I/O voltage level? I am wondering how other variants use it. Perhaps most variants actually have an external regulator and thus calls sdhci_set_power_reg() instead. Looping in Adrian, to see if he has some thoughts on this. Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
