Hi, On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:58:26AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:39:55PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > +Required property: > > + - compatible: Should be one of: > > + "ti,lm3532-backlight" > > + "ti,lm3631-backlight" > > + "ti,lm3632-backlight" > > + "ti,lm3633-backlight" > > + "ti,lm3695-backlight" > > + "ti,lm3697-backlight" > > Some of the parts only do backlight, so drop the "-backlight" on those. > And having a sub-node makes no sense in that case. Perhaps it should be > 2 binding documents separating the single function devices and MFDs. The > binding doc(s) doesn't have to align with the driver(s). You can have 1 > driver serve 2 bindings. Yes, there is LM3532 and LM3695, which is backlight only as far as I can see. Your suggestion contradicts with existing binding, though: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti-lmu.txt -- Sebastian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
