Hi Ladislav, On 19/02/17 11:02, Ladislav Michl wrote: > Hi Roger, > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:11:11PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 11/02/17 15:03, Ladislav Michl wrote: >>> OneNAND base address from FDT is ignored, so driver only works >>> for bootloader configured chipselect. Bring gpmc_probe_onenand_child >>> closer to gpmc_probe_generic_child to honour FDT configured base >>> address and to make future merge with gpmc_probe_generic_child >>> easier. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl <ladis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> using mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c should be deprecated. >> Instead of patching it further can we have a pure device tree approach >> without needing to rely on mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c? > > that's definitely a goal. I would propose to include this patch and > make further mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c deprecation patches part > of Tony's 'Drop some unused omap platform_data' series. > It seems like nobody is using gpmc_onenand_init() so let's get rid of it. I'm OK with fixing up the memory/omap-gpmc.c to support DT probing of OneNAND so it is functional. -- cheers, -roger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
