> >If this is the case, you'd better set > >(struct thermal_zone_params)->no_hwmon when registering the thermal > >zone device, in which case, the hwmon device will not be created. > > > >In fact, I'd prefer to change tzp->no_hwmon to tzp->hwmon to not create > >hwmon I/F by default, and see if there is anyone using it. If yes, we > >can set the flag in soc thermal driver, explicitly, at meantime, a > >hwmon compatible name is required. > > > >But one foreseeable result is that we may get bug reports from end user > >that some sensors (acpitz, etc) are gone in 'sensors' output. And TBH, > >I'm not quite sure if this can be counted as a regression or not. > > > > That sounds like fun. Changing bq27200-0 to bq27200_0 is Forbidden by > the ABI Police, but taking the entire device away is ok. Stop trying to break other people's systems. Thanks you. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
