* Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [170112 07:33]: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Yegor Yefremov > <yegorslists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> * Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [170111 13:52]: > >>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 3:05 PM, <yegorslists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > From: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > > >>> > This is an attempt to revive DT support for TI HECC that was started in 2015. > >>> > > >>> > I haven't changed much because not all questions could be fully answered: > >>> > > >>> > * Should HECC use "am3505" as compatible? > >>> > >>> I mean "ti,am3505-hecc" > >> > >> Yeah it should use the device name for the driver. > > I've looked at drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_emac.c and there > "ti,am3517-emac" will be used. Should we stick to am3517? am3505 won't > be used in any dts[i] file. If they are the same, then usually the earliest hardware naming can be used for later versions too. I don't know which was first am3517 or 3505. If you think "ti,am3517-hecc" makes sense I'm fine with that. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
