On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Alexandre Bailon <abailon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/09/2017 08:11 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: >>> Hmm if the cppi41 interrupt fires, the device has resumed :) >>> >>> I think we should have a cppi41.c specific flag that we can set >>> at the end of cppi41_resume() instead of list_empty() or >>> pm_runtime_active(). > I think the interrupt can only be fired if the device is active. I have no idea about this particular case, but believe me there are cases where above is not true. I think Tony keeps it in mind after good discussion about thread IRQ enforcement on shared interrupt handlers. > And the interrupt happen because the one descriptor queued during the > resume has been moved to completion queue > (so device is clocked and operational). Doesn't really matter in some cases. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
