On 01/09/2017 12:39 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Alexandre Bailon <abailon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [170109 09:04]:
>> We can occasionally get -EINPROGRESS for pm_runtime_get.
>> This is happening when an interrupt is fired before PM runtime had time
>> to update the PM state to RESUMED.
>> In that case, don't print any error.
>
> Hmm if the cppi41 interrupt fires, the device has resumed :)
>
> I think we should have a cppi41.c specific flag that we can set
> at the end of cppi41_resume() instead of list_empty() or
> pm_runtime_active().
>
> Regars,
>
> Tony
>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/dma/cppi41.c | 5 ++---
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/cppi41.c b/drivers/dma/cppi41.c
>> index 025fee4..2306020 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/cppi41.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/cppi41.c
>> @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static irqreturn_t cppi41_irq(int irq, void *data)
>> int error;
>>
>> error = pm_runtime_get(cdd->ddev.dev);
>> - if (error < 0)
>> + if ((error != -EINPROGRESS) && error < 0)
>> dev_err(cdd->ddev.dev, "%s pm runtime get: %i\n",
>> __func__, error);
Another question of curiosity :) -EINPROGRESS and pm_runtime_get() in general doesn't
guarantee that device is powered on and accessible immediately after this call, but
few lines below there are code which try to access registers
desc = cppi41_pop_desc(cdd, q_num);
Is it ok?
>>
>> @@ -492,8 +492,7 @@ static void cppi41_dma_issue_pending(struct dma_chan *chan)
>> */
>> if (error == -EINPROGRESS) {
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&cdd->lock, flags);
>> - if (list_empty(&cdd->pending))
>> - active = true;
>> + active = !!list_empty(&cdd->pending);
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cdd->lock, flags);
>> }
>> }
>> --
>> 2.10.2
>
--
regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
