* Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> [161207 21:08]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On 07-12-16, 20:56, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Looks like commit ef3caabee969 ("PM / OPP: Don't assume platform doesn't
> > have regulators") caused a regression in Linux next-20161207 for at least
> > omap4 pandaboard. We now hit kernel BUG at drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1235.
> >
> > Any ideas?
>
> I saw similar regression for Tegra and the offending commit is now
> dropped from pm/linux-next. So linux-next should be fine after
> fetching it today.
OK good to hear.
> But just for my understanding, who is doing voltage scaling for OMAP4
> then? The cpufreq-dt driver will only frequency scaling, as it fails
> to find a regulator for the CPUs.
Hmm good question. Maybe we don't have the regulators configured for
pandaboard?
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
