Re: Cpufreq regression in next-20161207

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Tony,

On 07-12-16, 20:56, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Looks like commit ef3caabee969 ("PM / OPP: Don't assume platform doesn't
> have regulators") caused a regression in Linux next-20161207 for at least
> omap4 pandaboard. We now hit kernel BUG at drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c:1235.
> 
> Any ideas?

I saw similar regression for Tegra and the offending commit is now
dropped from pm/linux-next. So linux-next should be fine after
fetching it today.

But just for my understanding, who is doing voltage scaling for OMAP4
then? The cpufreq-dt driver will only frequency scaling, as it fails
to find a regulator for the CPUs.

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux