On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Keerthy wrote: > palmas_dev and palmas_power_off are always assigned together. > So the check for palmas_dev inside palmas_power_off function > is redundant. Removing the same. > > Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mfd/palmas.c | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/palmas.c b/drivers/mfd/palmas.c > index 8f8bacb..ee9e9ea 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/palmas.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/palmas.c > @@ -431,9 +431,6 @@ static void palmas_power_off(void) > unsigned int addr; > int ret, slave; > > - if (!palmas_dev) > - return; > - > slave = PALMAS_BASE_TO_SLAVE(PALMAS_PMU_CONTROL_BASE); > addr = PALMAS_BASE_TO_REG(PALMAS_PMU_CONTROL_BASE, PALMAS_DEV_CTRL); > -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
