Hi, On Saturday 12 November 2016 03:08 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:54:37PM +0000, Wei Yongjun wrote: >> From: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> This node pointer is returned by of_get_next_child() with refcount >> incremented in this function. of_node_put() on it before exitting >> this function on error. >> >> This is detected by Coccinelle semantic patch. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Kishon, this looks correct to me, so I applied it to pci/host-dra7xx for > v4.10. Let me know if you have any issue with it. > >> --- >> drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c >> index 9595fad..79297e9 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c >> @@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ static int dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct pcie_port *pp) >> &intx_domain_ops, pp); >> if (!pp->irq_domain) { >> dev_err(dev, "Failed to get a INTx IRQ domain\n"); >> + of_node_put(pcie_intc_node); I think of_node_put should be used for both the error case and non-error case. Thanks Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html