On Tuesday 28 April 2009, Mark Brown wrote: > > For the record, that "incomplete constraints" message is bogus. > > On that board, VAUX3 has a complete set of constraints: it may > > only emit 2.8V. > > It's not VAUX3 that it's saying has incomplete constraints, it's the > board as a whole - if the constraints for the board were fully specified No; driver support != constraint. Only one of the issues is packaged as a "constraint". > (and the core had been told about it) then it would power off VAUX3 at > that point. > > > Mark and/or Liam ... you might want to fix that diagnostic, to > > avoid leading more developers astray! > > Probably shove a "board has" in there or something I guess. How about: "VAUX3 board support is incomplete". That's accurate. A comment there might suggest constraints and driver support as two common issues ... I'd not be surprised to see a few more idioms pop up. - Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
