On 09/21/16 06:52, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:33:23AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Fixes compiler warning on 64bit architectures.
>
> Would be good to give the warning message here
Let me revert this patch and patch #2 for the eDMA to get the warnings.
I will repost v2 with the updated commit messages.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c | 10 ++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
>> index e4f3bd1ae264..876e4ccaf033 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
>> @@ -16,8 +16,10 @@
>> #include <linux/of_device.h>
>> #include <linux/of_dma.h>
>>
>> -#define TI_XBAR_DRA7 0
>> -#define TI_XBAR_AM335X 1
>> +enum ti_xbar_type {
>> + TI_XBAR_DRA7 = 0,
>> + TI_XBAR_AM335X,
>> +};
>>
>> static const struct of_device_id ti_dma_xbar_match[] = {
>> {
>> @@ -395,7 +397,7 @@ static int ti_dra7_xbar_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> xbar->dmarouter.dev = &pdev->dev;
>> xbar->dmarouter.route_free = ti_dra7_xbar_free;
>> - xbar->dma_offset = (u32)match->data;
>> + xbar->dma_offset = (enum ti_xbar_type)match->data;
>>
>> mutex_init(&xbar->mutex);
>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, xbar);
>> @@ -428,7 +430,7 @@ static int ti_dma_xbar_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> if (unlikely(!match))
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> - switch ((u32)match->data) {
>> + switch ((enum ti_xbar_type)match->data) {
>> case TI_XBAR_DRA7:
>> ret = ti_dra7_xbar_probe(pdev);
>> break;
>> --
>> 2.10.0
>>
>
--
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
