Re: [PATCH 8/9] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: fix overflow check period

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:23:43PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> if yes then those changes are correct as from patch#7 point of 
> view, as from patch#8 because they are separate standalone changes.
> In patch patch#7 it reasonable to ball out earlier, while in patch#8
> it required to move forward a bit as I need to know maxsec. 

And what about the extra blank line?  AFAICT, placing the test later
in patch #7 is correct logic and has the advantage of not distracting
reviews with pointless churn!

Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux