Re: [PATCH v2 05/14] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: don't check slave num in runtime

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 09.08.16 14:34, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 08/06/2016 01:48 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
No need to check const slave num in runtime for every packet,
and ndev for slaves w/o ndev is anyway NULL. So remove redundant
check.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
index 70a9570..19aa4bb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
@@ -498,8 +498,7 @@ static const struct cpsw_stats cpsw_gstrings_stats[] = {
 				(func)(slave++, ##arg);			\
 	} while (0)
 #define cpsw_get_slave_ndev(priv, __slave_no__)				\
-	((__slave_no__ < priv->data.slaves) ?				\
-		priv->slaves[__slave_no__].ndev : NULL)
+		priv->slaves[__slave_no__].ndev

So after this change it will be
#define cpsw_get_slave_ndev(priv, __slave_no__) priv->slaves[__slave_no__].ndev

Can we just drop cpsw_get_slave_ndev() macro?
Sure. Will drop it in v3.


 #define cpsw_get_slave_priv(priv, __slave_no__)				\
 	(((__slave_no__ < priv->data.slaves) &&				\
 		(priv->slaves[__slave_no__].ndev)) ?			\




--
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux