> -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Lindgren [mailto:tony@xxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 12:10 AM > To: Shilimkar, Santosh > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7][RFC] OMAP4: Enable basic build support. > > * Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> [090421 06:08]: > > This patch updates the Makefile and defconfig for OMAP4. > Minimal set of > > drivers are enabled fot the kernel bootup. > > > > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> > > --- > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile > b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile > > index c49d9bf..68d50a8 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile > > @@ -3,9 +3,13 @@ > > # > > > > # Common support > > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4),y) > > +obj-y := id.o io.o control.o mux.o devices.o serial.o > gpmc.o timer-gp.o > > +else > > obj-y := irq.o id.o io.o sdrc.o control.o prcm.o clock.o mux.o \ > > devices.o serial.o gpmc.o timer-gp.o powerdomain.o \ > > clockdomain.o > > +endif > > This ifeq else we don't want to do as it breaks things for multi-omap. How do we handle this. For OMAP4, those files are not common and needed at this point of time. More so if we agree that OMAP4 won't support multi-omap, then this should be ok. Some thing like this can be done but then Makefile will be completely rewamped. # Common support obj-y := id.o io.o control.o mux.o devices.o serial.o gpmc.o timer-gp.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) += display.o sdrc.o prcm.o clock.o powerdomain.o clockdomain.o obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3) += display.o sdrc.o prcm.o clock.o powerdomain.o clockdomain.o Is this OK ?-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
