[Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: fix three implicit module use cases fed via gpio] On 23/07/2016 (Sat 10:09) Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > [...] > > > > But with ARM and GPIO being different subsystems, we'll need to get > > this in ARM 1st, and then wait a release before changing the GPIO > > header, otherwise we'll risk triggering these three build failures. > > > > So, if folks consider these three trivial changes OK for late in the > > for-4.8 cycle, then great. Otherwise I'll resubmit the ARM parts for > > for-4.9 and the GPIO bits for the one after that. [...] > Hi Paul, > > I'll take the mach-pxa changes to pxa/for-next tree with Linus's ack. > Tony, I think you will carry the remaining omap2 one, right ? > > As for the cycle, I'd prefer have it for-4.9 as we're at rc7 and it's a bit late > for me. If you want your GPIO bits to get in 4.9 I think I can commit to request > pull very early (-rc1 time) or give my ack so that Linus can carry these changes > through the gpio tree with the other changes. Yep, agreed it is now (Sat) a bit late, so as per what I said above, do whatever you are comfortable with and I'll react accordingly to make sure the gpio fix lands on a baseline with all the other three patches present and doesn't introduce build regressions. Thanks, Paul. > > Cheers. > > -- > Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
