Hi, On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 06:15:26PM +0200, joerg Reisenweber wrote: > On Fri 10 June 2016 10:59:40 Bin Liu wrote: > > The musb ug says the testmde is not used in normal operation, so my > > opinion is force_host should not be used for hacking n900 host mode if > > this is for real product development or support. > > You're aware N900 OS aka maemo is a) FOSS, and b) EOL at least from Nokia's > POV? So there's neither "product development" nor any _'official'_ support > involved. > And c) we (community) already _did_ use it since it was the only chance to > make hostmode sort of work for N900, it's not like we could redesign N900 > hardware to support regular hostmode, we need to work with what RL gave us. Well, misunderstanding does happening as Nishanth warned me offline :( > It evades me why you discourage resp reject this established solution. Not sure how you concluded I reject this. Instead I am taking patches. The only thing I did was warning that if you use force_host testmode in normal operation in your 'products', you would get liability problem. > Just Nokia not supporting hostmode evidently doesn't mean we can't get > anything done, and I don't see why we should refrain from doing so. Regards, -Bin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
