Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 09:22 -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote: >> stil thinking about it. These messages have made it easy to catch bugs >> with the PM code in the past (e.g., sad2d). Making them debug-level will >> require booting a kernel with clock debugging specifically >> compiled in. So I wonder if there might be a better way to deal with >> these... > > Yeah, I see your concern. I'm your user, and from my perspective this is > an excessive output to slow serial line. > > If you do not want re-compilation, I may send a different patch > like this: > > - printk(KERN_INFO "Disabling unused clock \"%s\"\n", clk->name); > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "Disabling unused clock \"%s\"\n", clk->name); > > in which case you would not loose the messages, but the messages > would not go to the serial line. > I prefer this method as well since i can see them simply by adding debug to the cmdline. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
