On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 01:38:18PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Maybe say you you found it (llvm, sparse, coccinelle?), and why this > is causing a problem for anyone. If it's just unnecessary but not > harmful, I'd probably ignore the patch. $ grep -rE '(^|\W)const(\s+\w+)+\s+const\s' I just happened to notice some unnecessary const in our internal code, so I grep'ed for it in a couple big OSS projects to see how common it was. Since I found only a few, I decided to remove them, but like I said it just gets ignored by all the compilers I know, so there's absolutely no harm in leaving this dead code around. > That's fine. Having multiple patches here is slightly better than just > one, but I'd also be fine with just taking the large patch because it > is an identical trivial change in multiple files. So, do you want me to split them up? I'd prefer not having to (slightly less work for me :P), but it doesn't really make much of a difference either way. Cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
