On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:57:15AM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > Hi, > > this requires a commit message. OK? This seems rather pointless in this case (and even more so for the typo fix I sent yesterday), but I guess you have some general rule to enforce. Would this do then? "The second `const` is unnecessary, and is simply ignored by most compilers." > Also, you should think about separating those changes in multiple patches > to ease inclusion in the kernel. I'll resend patch #4 as multiple patches. What the way proper to convey that *multiple* new patches replace *one* old one? Is it enough to just send those as a reply to this one? Cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
