* Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx> [160304 12:31]: > On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On 03/04/2016 12:40 PM, Adam Ford wrote: > >> Since there are a few different LogicPD Display Panel options, > >> this patch creates two dtsi files which can be included based on > >> which display panel is available. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > > > > Dumb question: any reason we cannot do this as device tree overlays? > > There was a whole different discussion on a different thread about the > desire to move display stuff to the bootloader and device tree and > keep it out of userspace and the kernel. I am just doing what I > thought the outcome was. Tomi and Tony might have a different > opinion. I thought by doing this, it would make it easy for people to > pick and choose which (if any LPD display they have and I tried to do > it in a similar fashion to how the SMC911x Ethernet dtsi file was done > which allows it to be included by a vareity of different boards. I think applying this won't hurt, it's easy to switch to use the DT overlays with this. Adam, can you please repost against current omap-for-v4.7/dt as this no longer applies? Thanks, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
