On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:52 PM, David Hagood <david.hagood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well, that's not what I would have expected - I would have thought reads on POP would have been faster than that, and cheaper - the SD being the same speed but less CPU is surprising. The POP flash may not have a DMA ability. Also, the POP flash contents are compressed and ECC corrected, so its a lot of extra work for the CPU. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
