Hi, * Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> [160329 16:36]: > Lets get somethings out of the way here: OMAP5 is NOT OMAP4. Other than > the technologies that are completely different, there has been quiet a > bit of descopes on OMAP5 Vs previous generation SoCs. Further, a ton of > effort in productizing OMAP3 and 4, which is completely missing in > OMAP5. Almost most of power management as has been functional during > OMAP3/4 has been descoped - making it more inline with DRA7 is the best > hope of moving things forward on OMAP5. Yeah well, like you say, there is still quite a bit of PM related synergy between am57xx and omap5. Many of the devices are the same and are using same PM runtime for clock gating also on am57xx. > From TI's perspective, despite a few of us community involved folks, > there is very less interest in investigating all the missing features on > OMAP5 at this point in time. Right, so for omap5 PM, it's mostly the omap5 PRCM related parts that are missing. And am57xx is not using PRCM which explains the TI perspective. So nothing stopping the community people from adding PM support for omap5 as needed and as long as there is interest. Cheers, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
