On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 15:03:19 +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > On 02/05/2016 01:39 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 15:14:47 -0800, Moritz Fischer wrote: > >> Hi Soeren, > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Sören Brinkmann > >> <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >>> But with this change the 'if !CPU_FREQ' becomes obsolete. > >> I'm confused, could you explain that statement? You don't want people > >> accidentally running with GT when CPU_FREQ is on, right? > > > > Correct. But with this Kconfig rework you can just deselect it in > > Kconfig. The generic HAVE_GT could always be selected. > > > > > Don't know whom should i ask - but what will be the final conclusion here? > Can it be merged? I think we don't break anything either way. Would just be some additional clean up to get rid of that mentioned constraint (which doesn't really work well anyway in the multi-arch kernel). So, no real objections to merging it from my side. Thanks, Sören -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
