Hi Linus,
On 13/02/16 14:42, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote:
pinctrl: single: Use a separate lockdep class
pinctrl: single: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
ARM: OMAP2+: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux.c | 4 ++--
arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 9 ++++-----
arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c | 1 +
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
Are these patches orthogonal so I can merge the pinctrl patch independently
of the OMAP patches if Tony ACKs this?
Thanks for the follow up.
IIUC they are dependent and remember Tony/Grygorii wanted them to be
merged together(at-least for bisectibility)
If not: should it be merged by me or through ARM SoC/Tony?
I think so.
Anyways waiting for maintainer feedback, but the above is good to know.
Grygorii was still not sure if this works and he couldn't give it a
test. He was traveling and may need more time to get back on this.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
