I've just replaced the of_iomap() call with an open coded version,
calling of_address_to_resource() and ioremap() directly. That was
needed so I can use the struct resource returned by
of_address_to_resource() to set the syscon_config.max_register. I
don't see where this could cause resource overlap. Does just setting
syscon_config.max_register to zero again make the problem disappear?
regards
Philipp
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [160212 16:31]:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Looks like commit effe02710335 ("mfd: syscon: Set regmap max_register
>> in of_syscon_register") somehow breaks smsc911x GPIO interrupt for
>> me at least on omap3:
>>
>> irq 241: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
>> CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.5.0-rc3-next-20160212 #864
>> Hardware name: Generic OMAP36xx (Flattened Device Tree)
>> [<c010fd44>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c094>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
>> [<c010c094>] (show_stack) from [<c045f24c>] (dump_stack+0xb0/0xe4)
>> [<c045f24c>] (dump_stack) from [<c01998e8>] (__report_bad_irq+0x24/0xc0)
>> [<c01998e8>] (__report_bad_irq) from [<c0199ce4>] (note_interrupt+0x27c/0x2dc)
>> [<c0199ce4>] (note_interrupt) from [<c0197220>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x184/0x200)
>> [<c0197220>] (handle_irq_event_percpu) from [<c01972d4>] (handle_irq_event+0x38/0x5c)
>> [<c01972d4>] (handle_irq_event) from [<c019a3d8>] (handle_level_irq+0xc0/0x154)
>> [<c019a3d8>] (handle_level_irq) from [<c0196784>] (generic_handle_irq+0x20/0x34)
>> [<c0196784>] (generic_handle_irq) from [<c049b690>] (omap_gpio_irq_handler+0x120/0x160)
>> [<c049b690>] (omap_gpio_irq_handler) from [<c01970f0>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x54/0x200)
>> [<c01970f0>] (handle_irq_event_percpu) from [<c01972d4>] (handle_irq_event+0x38/0x5c)
>> [<c01972d4>] (handle_irq_event) from [<c019a3d8>] (handle_level_irq+0xc0/0x154)
>> [<c019a3d8>] (handle_level_irq) from [<c0196784>] (generic_handle_irq+0x20/0x34)
>> [<c0196784>] (generic_handle_irq) from [<c0196a78>] (__handle_domain_irq+0x64/0xe0)
>> [<c0196a78>] (__handle_domain_irq) from [<c076f038>] (__irq_svc+0x58/0x78)
>> [<c076f038>] (__irq_svc) from [<c076e93c>] (_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x34/0x44)
>> [<c076e93c>] (_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore) from [<c019900c>] (__setup_irq+0x40c/0x5e0)
>> [<c019900c>] (__setup_irq) from [<c0199330>] (request_threaded_irq+0xc0/0x158)
>> [<c0199330>] (request_threaded_irq) from [<c05a4038>] (smsc911x_drv_probe+0x588/0xfec)
>> [<c05a4038>] (smsc911x_drv_probe) from [<c04fc1b4>] (platform_drv_probe+0x4c/0xb0)
>> [<c04fc1b4>] (platform_drv_probe) from [<c04fa89c>] (driver_probe_device+0x208/0x2c0)
>> [<c04fa89c>] (driver_probe_device) from [<c04fa9e8>] (__driver_attach+0x94/0x98)
>> [<c04fa9e8>] (__driver_attach) from [<c04f8bc4>] (bus_for_each_dev+0x6c/0xa0)
>> [<c04f8bc4>] (bus_for_each_dev) from [<c04f9d28>] (bus_add_driver+0x18c/0x214)
>> [<c04f9d28>] (bus_add_driver) from [<c04fb22c>] (driver_register+0x78/0xf8)
>> [<c04fb22c>] (driver_register) from [<c010180c>] (do_one_initcall+0x80/0x1dc)
>> [<c010180c>] (do_one_initcall) from [<c0b00ef0>] (kernel_init_freeable+0x218/0x2ec)
>> [<c0b00ef0>] (kernel_init_freeable) from [<c0768360>] (kernel_init+0x8/0xf4)
>> [<c0768360>] (kernel_init) from [<c01078d0>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24)
>> handlers:
>> [<c05a26d8>] smsc911x_irqhandler
>> Disabling IRQ #241
>> libphy: smsc911x-mdio: probed
>>
>> I'm not seeing the connection between regmap and GPIO, so no
>> idea what goes wrong here.
>
> The only regmap here is the scm_conf in omap3.dtsi. Probably some
> resource size calculation issue causing an overlap?
>
> Tony
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
