On Tue, 9 Feb 2016, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> Sorry got held up by the discussion here [1], that regression affects
> rmmod/re-insmod of wkup_m3_rproc as well. If I revert the guilty patch
> 5de85b9d57ab ("PM / runtime: Re-init runtime
> PM states at probe error and driver unbind") and apply these three patches, on
> initial probe of the wkup_m3_rproc and wkup_m3_ipc drivers in v4.5-rc3 I see:
>
> [ 15.593460] omap_hwmod: wkup_m3: _wait_target_disable failed
>
> Which is triggered by the reset of the wkup_m3 from the wkup_m3_ipc driver
> when booting the wkup_m3_rproc. Flow is:
>
> 1. wkup_m3_rproc probes and calls pm_runtime_get_sync, which calls hwmod
> _enable but bails out because _are_all_hardreset_lines_asserted(oh) causes it
> to return 0.
>
> 2. wkup_m3_ipc probes and calls rproc_boot, which triggers
> omap_device_deassert_hardreset in order to let the wkup_m3 start.
The patches that Kishon posted shouldn't change the existing hardreset
behavior for any IP block with HWMOD_CUSTOM_HARDRESET marked. If the
behavior changes before and after that patch set, something isn't right.
> It is inside the omap_device_deassert_hardreset ( and inside that,
> omap_hwmod_deassert_hardreset) where I end up with the error message, but
> after that rmmod/insmod of the module over and over again shows no additional
> error messages (at least with the above mentioned PM patch reverted).
I no longer recall why we had the _are_all_hardreset_lines_asserted(oh)
test in place. But we might be able to drop it now that we have the
HWMOD_CUSTOM_HARDRESET flag.
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
