On 02/05/2016 08:51 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote: > > Either way, I think any changes along these lines would probably be > cleaner ontop of the atomic update work (assuming some form of that > gets merged). And since it would also be outside the scope of this > patchset, you may still want to consider the simple debug message > in this patch as at least an interim state. > Sure, we should push these patches and rework this one later. Acked-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Neil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
