On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> [160126 15:15]: >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Looks like commit 5de85b9d57ab ("PM / runtime: Re-init runtime >> > PM states at probe error and driver unbind") broke PM on at least >> > omap3. It seems we now need to additionally also call >> > pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() to get things working again? >> > >> > The following fixes idling on omap3, but I'm wondering if we >> > should do something in pm_runtime_reinit() instead? >> >> Well, does it actually help if you add >> pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(dev) to pm_runtime_reinit()? > > No adding it to pm_runtime_reinit() does not help. Yes, I realized that it wouldn't help only after sending the previous message, sorry about that. The reason why it helps in the driver code seems to be that autosuspend_delay happens to be negative, so update_autosuspend() decrements the usage counter that would have stayed incremented otherwise. Or at least that's the only way it can help I see ATM. > Looks like we have RPM_ACTIVE set in pm_runtime_reinit() if that > gives any clues. It looks like pm_runtime_reinit() should clear the usage counter too. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html