Hi, On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:41:23 +0000 Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 01:37:31PM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 16:26:10 +0000 Mark Brown wrote: > > > > You're not just making the interrupt optional, you are also implementing > > > polling support. That's really unusual and there's no clear reason for > > > Any suggestions how to handle this case in a more sensible way? > > The above, for example - make the interrupt optional. > This will make it impossible to notify the system about overtemperature (and undervoltage). I implemented polling to be able to get at least overtemperature warnings. (Undervoltage cannot be handled sensibly without interrupt anyway) Lothar Waßmann -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
