On Friday 20 March 2009, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx> [090319 15:27]: > > > > * Least hassle ... I think all these should merge to the > > linux-omap tree in any case (and thence linux-pm): > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=123699264117846&w=2 > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=123699340818395&w=2 > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=123705919713239&w=2 > > Pushed these. That way we'll end up with a working > 2.6.29-omap1 :) I approve that message. ;) > Dave, got a version of the third patch above against the > mainline kernel? That could be added to the omap3-boards > queue for the upcoming merge window. That patch was a bit messy ... combined the VPLL2 bits, and the twl4030-power bits. The former can go to mainline, but only after the regulator framework updates for VPLL2; I'll make such a patch. The latter needs twl4030-power to get to mainline ... > > The second fix -- in some flavor -- is IMO still needed, > > since the first fix is just avoiding regulator framework > > bugs. > > To me it sounds like the regulator framework should eventually > handle the regulators left on by the bootloader. Just let me > know if some other patches are needed to l-o tree meanwhile. I may just prepare an mmc-twl4030 patch with ugly workarounds, since I'm getting the strong feeling that it'll take forever to get the regulator framework fixed in that area. Meanwhile, I suggest merging the updated version of the Overo patch, as sent by Steve. - Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
