On 11/30/2015 04:11 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 30 November 2015 15:45:34 Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> @@ -2428,6 +2436,22 @@ bool edma_filter_fn(struct dma_chan *chan, void *param)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(edma_filter_fn);
>>
>> +static bool edma_filter_for_map(struct dma_chan *chan, void *param)
>> +{
>> + bool match = false;
>> +
>> + if (chan->device->dev->driver == &edma_driver.driver) {
>> + struct edma_chan *echan = to_edma_chan(chan);
>> + unsigned ch_req = (unsigned)param;
>> + if (ch_req == echan->ch_num) {
>> + /* The channel is going to be used as HW synchronized */
>> + echan->hw_triggered = true;
>> + match = true;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + return match;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int edma_init(void)
>>
>
> I don't see the difference between edma_filter_fn and edma_filter_for_map.
> Why do you need both?
edma_filter_fn:
unsigned ch_req = *(unsigned *)param;
edma_filter_for_map:
unsigned ch_req = (unsigned)param;
If I want to reuse the edma_filter_fn, I would need an unsigned array for the
eDMA event numbers in the board files to be able to provide the pointer to
each of them.
--
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
