On 11/30/2015 04:51 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> +struct dma_chan *dma_request_chan(struct device *dev, const char *name)
>> +{
>> + struct dma_device *device, *_d;
>> + struct dma_chan *chan = NULL;
>> +
>> + /* If device-tree is present get slave info from here */
>> + if (dev->of_node)
>> + chan = of_dma_request_slave_channel(dev->of_node, name);
>> +
>> + /* If device was enumerated by ACPI get slave info from here */
>> + if (ACPI_HANDLE(dev) && !chan)
>
> The preferable way is to use
> has_acpi_companion() instead of ACPI_HANDLE().
I have done this part based on the dma_request_slave_channel_reason().
Will switch to use the has_acpi_companion() for the next RFC.
>> + chan = acpi_dma_request_slave_chan_by_name(dev, name);
>> +
>> + if (chan)
>> + return chan;
>> +
--
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
