Re: [PATCH B 3/3] tidspbridge: decreate timeout to a saner value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando <x0095840@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Felipe,
>
>        I am seeing with this patch because of the timeout:
>
> DSP device detected !!
> DSPProcessor_Attach succeeded.
> dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
> dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
> dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
> dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
> dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
> dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
> dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
> dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
> dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
> dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
> dspbridge: timed out waiting for mailbox
> ...
>
> Did you see any issue when you change to 1ms? Maybe we can use a bigger timeout.

Did you apply patch #1 of the B series?

I didn't see any timeout on my tests.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux