On 13/08/15 10:51, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 08/13/2015 11:54 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 12/08/15 18:45, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
[...]
diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
index 6de638b..bdb1b9d 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
@@ -1024,6 +1024,10 @@ int irq_chip_set_vcpu_affinity_parent(struct
irq_data *data, void *vcpu_info)
int irq_chip_set_wake_parent(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
{
data = data->parent_data;
+
+ if (irq_data_get_irq_chip(data)->flags & IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE)
+ return 0;
+
[Nit] I think the irq core can access data->chip directly. Either way,
it's better to be consistent, the statement following doesn't use helper
function.
thanks. I'll change it to:
if (data->chip->flags & IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE)
return 0;
Otherwise looks good to me.
Does it means that I can add your Reviewed-by: with above change?
Yes you can.
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
