* Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> [150505 07:55]: > On Tuesday 05 May 2015 07:43:08 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> [150505 03:56]: > > > On Monday 04 May 2015 13:01:54 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > > > > For dropping the remaining omap3 legacy boot support, we still > > > > have the following board-*.c files: > > > > > > > > BOARD REASON NEEDED > > > > board-ldp.c Still used in RMKs boot test system > > > > board-omap3logic.c Getting a .dts file for v4.2 > > > > board-omap3pandora.c Got a .dts file for v4.1 > > > > board-rx51-*.c Needs /proc/atags support for user space > > > > > > > > I'm hoping we can drop those for v4.3 merge window, then keep > > > > the platform data around for one more merge window in case of > > > > reverting needed, then drop the platform data too for v4.4 > > > > if no issues needing reverting are found. > > > > > > Sounds great. Has there been a conclusion about what to do for the > > > rx51 /proc/atags support? > > > > I believe we just need to enable /proc/atags also for device tree > > based booting if CONFIG_ARM_ATAG_DTB_COMPAT. Pali may have more > > info on that. > > > > Then looks like Pali's two patches for showing the revision are > > still pending in thread "[PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: DT: > > Add support for Revision": > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg401535.html > > I think I already sent all need patches to ML. But I did not check if > you merged them or not. I did not get any new comments for them for a > while and right now I do not have time for looking at it again. Oh OK, do you have link to the /proc/atags patch somewhere? Maybe Arnd and Nico can pick them up and sort out how we should queue them with Russell? > I'm against removing board-rx51*.c files before /proc/cpuinfo and > /proc/atags will be available also for DT booted machine... I agree those should be supported also for DT based booting. > Plus there were some other regression for DT booted N900 (not only /proc > files), but I do not remember them now. I sent more emails where I > wrote it. Maybe it is fixed, maybe not, just search into archive for my > emails. OK > I can try to find some time at the weekend (this or next) to test > 4.1-rc* kernel on N900 and report what is working... Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
