On Tuesday 05 May 2015 17:06:38 Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> [150505 07:55]: > > On Tuesday 05 May 2015 07:43:08 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> [150505 03:56]: > > > > On Monday 04 May 2015 13:01:54 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > For dropping the remaining omap3 legacy boot support, > > > > > we still have the following board-*.c files: > > > > > > > > > > BOARD REASON NEEDED > > > > > board-ldp.c Still used in RMKs boot test > > > > > system board-omap3logic.c Getting a .dts file > > > > > for v4.2 board-omap3pandora.c Got a .dts file for > > > > > v4.1 board-rx51-*.c Needs /proc/atags > > > > > support for user space > > > > > > > > > > I'm hoping we can drop those for v4.3 merge window, > > > > > then keep the platform data around for one more merge > > > > > window in case of reverting needed, then drop the > > > > > platform data too for v4.4 if no issues needing > > > > > reverting are found. > > > > > > > > Sounds great. Has there been a conclusion about what to > > > > do for the rx51 /proc/atags support? > > > > > > I believe we just need to enable /proc/atags also for > > > device tree based booting if CONFIG_ARM_ATAG_DTB_COMPAT. > > > Pali may have more info on that. > > > > > > Then looks like Pali's two patches for showing the > > > revision are still pending in thread "[PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: > > > /proc/cpuinfo: DT: Add support for Revision": > > > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg401535.html > > > > I think I already sent all need patches to ML. But I did not > > check if you merged them or not. I did not get any new > > comments for them for a while and right now I do not have > > time for looking at it again. > > Oh OK, do you have link to the /proc/atags patch somewhere? > > Maybe Arnd and Nico can pick them up and sort out how we > should queue them with Russell? > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/26/648 -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
