On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:12:03AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > On 17.04.2015 04:00, Michael Welling wrote: > >On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 01:23:50AM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > >>On 17.04.2015 00:09, Michael Welling wrote: > >>>On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:37:19PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: > >>>>On 16.04.2015 18:17, Michael Welling wrote: > [...] > >>>What would be the proper error path? > >>>What cleanup is required? > >> > >>A proper error path would be to release any claimed resource > >>on any error. If you look at the code, the only resources that > >>need to be released are the two clocks in question. > > > >So for every error return in the probe function and in the of si5351_dt_parse > >it needs to clk_put first right? > > Not quite. The driver should clk_put() every clock that it called a > [of_]clk_get() for. The thing is that clocks can be passed by > platform_data and we never claim them. I've always said clocks (as in struct clk) should never be passed through platform data. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
