* Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx> [150202 09:50]: > Quoting Tony Lindgren (2015-02-02 08:12:37) > > > > [ 10.568206] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > [ 10.568206] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at drivers/clk/clk.c:925 clk_disable+0x28/0x34() > > [ 10.568237] Modules linked in: > > [ 10.568237] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 3.19.0-rc6-next-20150202 #2037 > > [ 10.568237] Hardware name: Generic OMAP4 (Flattened Device Tree) > > [ 10.568267] [<c0015bdc>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c001222c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) > > [ 10.568267] [<c001222c>] (show_stack) from [<c05d2014>] (dump_stack+0x84/0x9c) > > [ 10.568267] [<c05d2014>] (dump_stack) from [<c003ea90>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x7c/0xb8) > > [ 10.568298] [<c003ea90>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c003eb68>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24) > > [ 10.568298] [<c003eb68>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c04c1ffc>] (clk_disable+0x28/0x34) > > [ 10.568328] [<c04c1ffc>] (clk_disable) from [<c0025b3c>] (_disable_clocks+0x18/0x68) > > [ 10.568328] [<c0025b3c>] (_disable_clocks) from [<c0026f14>] (_idle+0x10c/0x214) > > [ 10.568328] [<c0026f14>] (_idle) from [<c0855fac>] (_setup+0x338/0x410) > > [ 10.568359] [<c0855fac>] (_setup) from [<c0027360>] (omap_hwmod_for_each+0x34/0x60) > > [ 10.568359] [<c0027360>] (omap_hwmod_for_each) from [<c08563c4>] (__omap_hwmod_setup_all+0x30/0x40) > > [ 10.568389] [<c08563c4>] (__omap_hwmod_setup_all) from [<c0008a04>] (do_one_initcall+0x80/0x1dc) > > [ 10.568389] [<c0008a04>] (do_one_initcall) from [<c0848ea0>] (kernel_init_freeable+0x204/0x2d0) > > [ 10.568420] [<c0848ea0>] (kernel_init_freeable) from [<c05cdab8>] (kernel_init+0x8/0xec) > > [ 10.568420] [<c05cdab8>] (kernel_init) from [<c000e790>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24) > > [ 10.568420] ---[ end trace cb88537fdc8fa211 ]--- For reference, the above is line 992 in clk-next. > This looks like mis-matched enable/disable calls. We now have unique > struct clk pointers for every call to clk_get. I haven't yet looked > through the hwmod code but I have a feeling that we're doing something > like this: > > /* enable clock */ > my_clk = clk_get(...); > clk_prepare_enable(my_clk); > clk_put(my_clk); > > /* do some work */ > do_work(); > > /* disable clock */ > my_clk = clk_get(...); > clk_disable_unprepare(my_clk); > clk_put(my_clk); > > The above pattern no longer works since my_clk will be two different > unique pointers, but it really should be one stable pointer across the > whole usage of the clk. E.g: > > /* enable clock */ > my_clk = clk_get(...); > clk_prepare_enable(my_clk); > > /* do some work */ > do_work(); > > /* disable clock */ > clk_disable_unprepare(my_clk); > clk_put(my_clk); > > Again, I haven't looked through the code, so the above is just an > educated guess. > > Anyways I am testing with an OMAP4460 Panda ES and I didn't see the > above. Is there a test you are running to get this? Just booting 4430-sdp with omap2plus_defconfig. And git bisect points to 59cf3fcf9baf ("clk: Make clk API return per-user struct clk instances") as you already guessed. > > [ 10.568450] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > > [ 10.568450] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c:436 omap3_noncore_dpll_enable+0xdc/0 > > x10c() > > [ 10.568450] Modules linked in: > > [ 10.568481] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 3.19.0-rc6-next-20150202 #2037 > > [ 10.568481] Hardware name: Generic OMAP4 (Flattened Device Tree) > > [ 10.568481] [<c0015bdc>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c001222c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) > > [ 10.568511] [<c001222c>] (show_stack) from [<c05d2014>] (dump_stack+0x84/0x9c) > > [ 10.568511] [<c05d2014>] (dump_stack) from [<c003ea90>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x7c/0xb8) > > [ 10.568511] [<c003ea90>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c003eb68>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x1c/0x24) > > [ 10.568542] [<c003eb68>] (warn_slowpath_null) from [<c0035800>] (omap3_noncore_dpll_enable+0xdc/0x10c) > > [ 10.568542] [<c0035800>] (omap3_noncore_dpll_enable) from [<c04c0a10>] (clk_core_enable+0x60/0x9c) > > [ 10.568572] [<c04c0a10>] (clk_core_enable) from [<c04c09f0>] (clk_core_enable+0x40/0x9c) > > [ 10.568572] ---[ end trace cb88537fdc8fa212 ]--- > > ... > > This is the same issue discussed already in this thread[0]. Feedback > from Tero & Paul on how to handle it would be nice. Yes that one is a separate issue. > Please let me know if anything else breaks for you. Also off-idle on omap3 seems to be broken by commit 59cf3fcf9baf. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html