Hi Roger, On 02/02/2015 06:09 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: > Chanwoo, > > On 02/02/15 07:04, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> Hi Roger, >> >> On 01/30/2015 11:05 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 30/01/15 13:04, Roger Quadros wrote: >>>> Felipe & Chanwoo, >>>> >>>> On 26/01/15 14:15, Roger Quadros wrote: >>>>> The recommended name for USB-Host cable state is "USB-Host" and not >>>>> "USB-HOST" as per drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c extcon_cable_name. >>>>> >>>>> Change all instances of "USB-HOST" to "USB-Host". >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> >>>>> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> >>>> >>>> This patch has no dependency to the rest so can be picked up as soon as possible. >>>> >>>> Do you think it is better to go via the USB tree? >>>> If yes then Chanwoo, can you please Ack this one? Thanks. >>>> >>>> This would mean that only the first patch needs to go through extcon tree as Tony >>>> will pick the rest. >>> >>> Hold on. Let's first decide what we really want to go ahead with >>> "USB-Host" or "USB-HOST". >> >> Currently, extcon driver have used the specific cable name(USB-Host or USB-HOST) >> without any standard way. So, I have plan to define common cable name in extcon >> header file by using capital letter. > > OK. In that case, this patch is not required. > I will resend patch 1 with cable name corrected to "USB-HOST". If you possbile, I want to use 'USB-HOST' cable name in drivers related to extcon. If we use different cable name, this cause the confusion to control cable. Thanks, Chanwoo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
