Hi Roger, On 01/30/2015 11:05 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: > Hi, > > On 30/01/15 13:04, Roger Quadros wrote: >> Felipe & Chanwoo, >> >> On 26/01/15 14:15, Roger Quadros wrote: >>> The recommended name for USB-Host cable state is "USB-Host" and not >>> "USB-HOST" as per drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c extcon_cable_name. >>> >>> Change all instances of "USB-HOST" to "USB-Host". >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> >>> Reviewed-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> >> >> This patch has no dependency to the rest so can be picked up as soon as possible. >> >> Do you think it is better to go via the USB tree? >> If yes then Chanwoo, can you please Ack this one? Thanks. >> >> This would mean that only the first patch needs to go through extcon tree as Tony >> will pick the rest. > > Hold on. Let's first decide what we really want to go ahead with > "USB-Host" or "USB-HOST". Currently, extcon driver have used the specific cable name(USB-Host or USB-HOST) without any standard way. So, I have plan to define common cable name in extcon header file by using capital letter. Thanks, Chanwoo Choi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
