On Wednesday 26 November 2014 18:54:12 Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> [141125 13:33]: > > On Tuesday 25 November 2014 22:08:17 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > On Sunday 08 December 2013 00:22:06 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > * Sebastian Reichel <sre@xxxxxxxx> [131207 15:04]: > > > > > On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 01:11:37PM -0800, Tony > > > > > Lindgren > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I asked Pali to send me his copy of the updated > > > > > > > NOLO bootloader, so that I can test this. I just > > > > > > > checked the omap documentation (I only have > > > > > > > access to the public one) and crypto related > > > > > > > stuff is not documented for the > > > > > > > L3_PM_READ_PERMISSION register. There are a > > > > > > > couple of reserved bits, which may be used for > > > > > > > this, though. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I also CC'd Joel Fernandes, since he worked on the > > > > > > > driver before and may have access to the > > > > > > > documentation. > > > > > > > > > > > > Looks like at least the 36xx public version > > > > > > referenced here has them: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg21857.htm > > > > > > l > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd assume the registers are the same for 34xx since > > > > > > we don't have them defined separately in the > > > > > > kernel. > > > > > > > > > > I can't find it in the omap36xx documentation either. > > > > > Maybe I search at the wrong position. I tried to find > > > > > something crypto related in > > > > > > > > > > Table 9-89. L3_PM_READ_PERMISSION_i > > > > > > > > Hmm maybe it's done based on the address in > > > > L3_PM_ADDR_MATCH_k? > > > > > > > > I guess the thing to do would be to compare the register > > > > output between the two different firmware versions. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Tony > > > > > > Tony, if you can tell me how to read those registers I can > > > provide output from both bootloaders (one that enable aes > > > support in L3 firewall and one which not). > > > > > > Also I can test other patches or provide other logs if you > > > need something more... > > > > CCing Nishanth Menon > > Maybe just try dumping out the L3_PM_ADDR_MATCH_* registers > during the boot? > > > Problem is that when L3 firewall is not configured by signed > > bootloader then loading omap aes driver cause kernel crash. > > We need some code which can check if omap aes is enabled or > > not at runtime in kernel... > > > > More details with full email tread conversation is there: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/108397/ > > AFAIK we can't change the configuration, but it should be > readable somewhere. Sorry don't know which registers would > show the configuration other than the L3_PM_ADDR_MATCH_* > registers. > > Regards, > > Tony Hello, after playing with aes and non-aes version of bootloaders I found out that code which configure L3 firewall must be in signed X-Loader part. So probably we cannot change configuration at runtime... Tony, any idea how to dump L3_PM_ADDR_MATCH_* registers from userspace or from kernel? Now I have configured one N900 with original Nokia X-Loader (where loading omap aes driver cause kernel crash) and one N900 with aes X-Loader (where loading omap aes driver is working). -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.