* Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> [150113 11:40]: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:29:23AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > Note that eventually we should handle the RX and TX interrupts > > separately like cpsw is now doing. However, so far I have not seen > > any issues with this based on my testing, so it seems to behave a > > little different compared to the cpsw that had a similar issue. > > pretty much the same thing that happens with CPSW, I think that a future > patch might want to change things so that we only write EOI to the IRQ > that actually fires, though. Yeah I agree that's totally the way to go for the future. I've tried to expose that issue here with nuttcp but so far no luck. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
