> One idea that has come up in the past but never saw an implementation > is to make the ttyS namespace and minor numbers completely generic and > let any serial port driver use it. This would be a major rework, but > have the added advantage of cleaning up a number of other namespace > issues as well. There also lots of open question, in particular how > to maintain compatibility with existing drivers. One could imagine > that each uart always gets a ttyS device and optionally also gets > a device node for the same port with a driver specific chardev as > most of them do today. Or it could be an either/or decision that is > made at compile time or as a module parameter. I'm not sure we should use ttyS for it. ttyS means 8250, a lot of existing code knows what ttyS is and what sort of ioctls and the like are assumed. A generic namespace needs not to be attached to a legacy naming (eg also put all serial ports in /dev/serial/0 /dev/serial/1 etc either via the tty layer or via systemd/udev) Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
