Hello,
On 2015-01-05 18:20, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 13:19-20150105, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
All four register for latency and filter settings cannot be written in
non-secure mode and they should go through l2c_write_sec(). More on this
can be found in CoreLink Level 2 Cache Controller L2C-310 Technical
Reference Manual, 3.2. Register summary, table 3.1. This have been checked
the TRM for r3p3, but it should be uniform for all revisions.
Reported-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
index 5e65ca8dea62..0aeeaa95c42d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
@@ -623,14 +623,14 @@ static void l2c310_resume(void)
unsigned revision;
/* restore pl310 setup */
- writel_relaxed(l2x0_saved_regs.tag_latency,
- base + L310_TAG_LATENCY_CTRL);
- writel_relaxed(l2x0_saved_regs.data_latency,
- base + L310_DATA_LATENCY_CTRL);
- writel_relaxed(l2x0_saved_regs.filter_end,
- base + L310_ADDR_FILTER_END);
- writel_relaxed(l2x0_saved_regs.filter_start,
- base + L310_ADDR_FILTER_START);
+ l2c_write_sec(l2x0_saved_regs.tag_latency, base,
+ L310_TAG_LATENCY_CTRL);
+ l2c_write_sec(l2x0_saved_regs.data_latency, base,
+ L310_DATA_LATENCY_CTRL);
+ l2c_write_sec(l2x0_saved_regs.filter_end, base,
+ L310_ADDR_FILTER_END);
+ l2c_write_sec(l2x0_saved_regs.filter_start, base,
+ L310_ADDR_FILTER_START);
revision = readl_relaxed(base + L2X0_CACHE_ID) &
L2X0_CACHE_ID_RTL_MASK;
Do you need the following as well at this point in the patch series?
Agreed that the writes will disappear later in the series.
Right. Thanks for pointing this. I will send an updated version, which
will also fix the checkpatch --strict issues.
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
index 0aeeaa9..7afab37 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0.c
@@ -1135,28 +1135,28 @@ static void __init l2c310_of_parse(const struct device_node *np,
of_property_read_u32_array(np, "arm,tag-latency", tag, ARRAY_SIZE(tag));
if (tag[0] && tag[1] && tag[2])
- writel_relaxed(
+ l2c_write_sec(
L310_LATENCY_CTRL_RD(tag[0] - 1) |
L310_LATENCY_CTRL_WR(tag[1] - 1) |
L310_LATENCY_CTRL_SETUP(tag[2] - 1),
- l2x0_base + L310_TAG_LATENCY_CTRL);
+ l2x0_base, L310_TAG_LATENCY_CTRL);
of_property_read_u32_array(np, "arm,data-latency",
data, ARRAY_SIZE(data));
if (data[0] && data[1] && data[2])
- writel_relaxed(
+ l2c_write_sec(
L310_LATENCY_CTRL_RD(data[0] - 1) |
L310_LATENCY_CTRL_WR(data[1] - 1) |
L310_LATENCY_CTRL_SETUP(data[2] - 1),
- l2x0_base + L310_DATA_LATENCY_CTRL);
+ l2x0_base, L310_DATA_LATENCY_CTRL);
of_property_read_u32_array(np, "arm,filter-ranges",
filter, ARRAY_SIZE(filter));
if (filter[1]) {
- writel_relaxed(ALIGN(filter[0] + filter[1], SZ_1M),
- l2x0_base + L310_ADDR_FILTER_END);
- writel_relaxed((filter[0] & ~(SZ_1M - 1)) | L310_ADDR_FILTER_EN,
- l2x0_base + L310_ADDR_FILTER_START);
+ l2c_write_sec(ALIGN(filter[0] + filter[1], SZ_1M),
+ l2x0_base, L310_ADDR_FILTER_END);
+ l2c_write_sec((filter[0] & ~(SZ_1M - 1)) | L310_ADDR_FILTER_EN,
+ l2x0_base, L310_ADDR_FILTER_START);
}
ret = l2x0_cache_size_of_parse(np, aux_val, aux_mask, &assoc, SZ_512K);
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
