Hi, On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 04:59:11PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 14:31:19 -0600 > > > What you're saying here is that you prefer to drop a feature that works > > for all other 1023 IDs because 1 ID is quirky. Sounds like overkill > > to me. > > The other option is to software fallback only for VLAN 1. now we're talking. Keep in mind, however, that this IP runs on mere single-core cortex A8 and single-core cortex A9 devices which already have somewhat of a hard-time keeping up with the non-accelerated checksum calculations. But fair enough, if that's the way to go, it is the way to go. cheers -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature